Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Arc40k 2015 player pack up, Now with extra theme
jimjimjimmyjim
post Nov 5 2014, 11:32 PM
Post #21


Member
*

Group: Banned
Posts: 8,953
Joined: 13-April 11
Member No.: 11,099



Yep you did all that and you quoted me in the process, and then you outline how hard it must be for for me to follow after I requested why you were telling me about it.

So you created the scenario in your own mind, drew your own conclusion, and decided to use me as your guinea pig, all of which was a fabrication of your own mind. Well done!


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimjimjimmyjim
post Nov 5 2014, 11:37 PM
Post #22


Member
*

Group: Banned
Posts: 8,953
Joined: 13-April 11
Member No.: 11,099



I did think that forts were allowed as in the example of an arc forged list they quoted 1 fortification was allowed, but then went onto to say that strong hold was banned.

So I seeked clarification. (Personally I think this was an oversight by the writers, but that's fine we all make mistakes)

Can we leave it there?

Lets admit we both made a mistake, we both misunderstood, and leave it there.

Can we instead allow the topic to continue in a better and more appropriate, way?

This post has been edited by jimjimjimmyjim: Nov 5 2014, 11:38 PM


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fuggorf
post Nov 5 2014, 11:43 PM
Post #23


Not the hero Gotham deserves
Group Icon

Group: Staff
Posts: 2,223
Joined: 30-January 07
From: Coburg, Melbourne
Member No.: 3,749



QUOTE
(Personally I think this was an oversight by the writers, but that's fine we all make mistakes)


It isn't. It's very deliberate. The Forts slot is in case a codex were released that contained a fortification. That army could use it's specific fortification. It was a way of future-proofing the pack.


--------------------
Fuggorf's Hit List:

Mitch Wragg

QUOTE
Yeah that's right Ben, I said you were right. ON THE INTERNET ohmy.gif!

My moderator voice is rainbow
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimjimjimmyjim
post Nov 6 2014, 12:11 AM
Post #24


Member
*

Group: Banned
Posts: 8,953
Joined: 13-April 11
Member No.: 11,099



Ok, personally I have been waiting on the edge of my seat for a while for this to happen ESP considering how many codexes have come and gone where perfect example of an army specific fort may come out but nothing has happened to date.

On a side note, do all chapter approved publications that exist except in the case of formations (obviously) and any other DLC or dataslates also apply?

Example, can be'lakor be added to a daemon or chaos army, or because his book is seperate can he not be used?

Sorry if my grammar isn't so great...


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fuggorf
post Nov 6 2014, 12:55 AM
Post #25


Not the hero Gotham deserves
Group Icon

Group: Staff
Posts: 2,223
Joined: 30-January 07
From: Coburg, Melbourne
Member No.: 3,749



The player's pack notes that we have disallowed dataslates. Belakor, cypher and co are right out.

Things like the new Tyranid MC's and spores are ok though. If in doubt, ask.


--------------------
Fuggorf's Hit List:

Mitch Wragg

QUOTE
Yeah that's right Ben, I said you were right. ON THE INTERNET ohmy.gif!

My moderator voice is rainbow
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimjimjimmyjim
post Nov 6 2014, 03:52 AM
Post #26


Member
*

Group: Banned
Posts: 8,953
Joined: 13-April 11
Member No.: 11,099



Thanks, I find all these new publications that come out all a bit confusing, when it comes to what is in and what isnt...


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimjimjimmyjim
post Nov 6 2014, 05:30 AM
Post #27


Member
*

Group: Banned
Posts: 8,953
Joined: 13-April 11
Member No.: 11,099



So would this mean gerantius is out, but the looted wagon is in?


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fuggorf
post Nov 6 2014, 09:07 AM
Post #28


Not the hero Gotham deserves
Group Icon

Group: Staff
Posts: 2,223
Joined: 30-January 07
From: Coburg, Melbourne
Member No.: 3,749



Yeah, that's our intention


--------------------
Fuggorf's Hit List:

Mitch Wragg

QUOTE
Yeah that's right Ben, I said you were right. ON THE INTERNET ohmy.gif!

My moderator voice is rainbow
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimjimjimmyjim
post Nov 6 2014, 10:06 AM
Post #29


Member
*

Group: Banned
Posts: 8,953
Joined: 13-April 11
Member No.: 11,099



Ok


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pasperou
post Nov 7 2014, 09:08 PM
Post #30


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 4-December 12
Member No.: 13,750



Yay on wagon!


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th July 2019 - 02:28 AM