Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Necron "Mind in the machine"
GypsyMoth
post Feb 22 2012, 07:17 AM
Post #1


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 19-November 09
Member No.: 8,497
These question came up last game I had.

Is the Necron "Mind in the machine" power a shooting attack? It has to have line of sight, has a range of 18", it has to roll to take effect, and happens at the start of the shooting phase. I would tend to think it is for those reasons.

If so, can it be used while the lord is in CC? Didn't come up but I would call that it can't.

This one did come up: Can the lord (attached to a squad) use it against a vehicle while the squad fires at another target? I avoided this question by shooting at the same target (the MITM failed so I gaussed the target anyway). My feel is no due to my call that it is a shooting attack, but I have no evidence or rule reference to back this up.


--------------------
"Light a man a fire, he's warm for a day...Light a man ON fire, he's warm for the rest of his life"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
YogoZuno
post Feb 22 2012, 07:46 AM
Post #2


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 7,752
Joined: 19-November 04
From: Brisbane
Member No.: 57
Does the power mention anything about being a shooting attack? Is there an FAQ entry to say it is? If not, then it isn't a shooting attack, and has none of the restrictions of one.


--------------------
The Big Weekend 40k 2007/2009
Winter Warfest 2010/2011/2012
Orktoberfest 40k 2009/2010/2011/2012
Two-time Quarter Master Fluff Bunny
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Proximity
post Feb 22 2012, 07:48 AM
Post #3


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 2,779
Joined: 30-December 06
From: Wellington NZ
Member No.: 3,650
It's most definitely not a shooting attack.

The one big query over it is whether you can use it while on a command barge after the last rulebook FAQ - I chose to err on the side of caution and dropped him from my list accordingly.


--------------------
QUOTE(Buddha @ Apr 12 2011, 03:34 PM)


PS, Comp is for suckas. Go the 3 Long Fangs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Reclusiarch Rusty
post Feb 22 2012, 10:12 AM
Post #4


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 1,459
Joined: 14-October 06
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 3,241
Didn't the FAQ prevent people from using Fire Points to draw LOS for abilities? Aren't command barges open-topped, so you would have LOS anyway?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
neil
post Feb 22 2012, 10:52 AM
Post #5


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 11,485
Joined: 13-January 06
From: Adelaide
Member No.: 2,415
QUOTE(Reclusiarch Rusty @ Feb 22 2012, 09:42 AM) *

Didn't the FAQ prevent people from using Fire Points to draw LOS for abilities? Aren't command barges open-topped, so you would have LOS anyway?


nah, an open-topped vehicle counts as one big fire point. Probably. It does leave a little room for confusion.


--------------------
Please ban everyone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ÆON
post Feb 22 2012, 10:52 AM
Post #6


Edition Change Skeptic
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 9,484
Joined: 19-November 04
From: A Hole in the Ground (Canberra)
Member No.: 222
QUOTE(Reclusiarch Rusty @ Feb 22 2012, 11:12 AM) *

Didn't the FAQ prevent people from using Fire Points to draw LOS for abilities? Aren't command barges open-topped, so you would have LOS anyway?


Can you fire from a open topped transport? If you say yes; then it must have a fire point to shoot from. The Rulebook implies that open topped transports have fire points.


--------------------

"Hail ÆON - Slayer of the Scrubs"

Yes, I really am that awesome :)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Reclusiarch Rusty
post Feb 22 2012, 02:55 PM
Post #7


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 1,459
Joined: 14-October 06
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 3,241
Just an unlimited amount of them?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Harvey Birdman
post Feb 22 2012, 05:59 PM
Post #8


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 4,281
Joined: 20-September 08
From: Adelaide
Member No.: 6,103
Page 70:
"Open topped vehicles do not have specific fire points. Instead.... all passengers may fire" Measure range and LOS from the hull.

Whether you can then draw LOS from an open topped vehicle NOT through a firepoint for non-shooting..... I don't know. But probably not.

We can certainly measure range from the hull - but no rule for LOS.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ScoJu
post Feb 22 2012, 06:46 PM
Post #9


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 739
Joined: 23-November 11
Member No.: 12,209
all passengers may fire

If you want to argue that Open-Topped transports do not have fire points, then the Mind in the Machine is not a shooting attack.
If you want to argue that Open Topped transports have an unlimited number of fire points, the the mind in the machine is not a shooting attack.
QUOTE
If so, can it be used while the lord is in CC? Didn't come up but I would call that it can't.

Ergo - no.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
neil
post Feb 22 2012, 09:47 PM
Post #10


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 11,485
Joined: 13-January 06
From: Adelaide
Member No.: 2,415
QUOTE(Harvey Birdman @ Feb 22 2012, 05:29 PM) *

Page 70:
"Open topped vehicles do not have specific fire points. Instead.... all passengers may fire" Measure range and LOS from the hull.


Alternately, "Open topped vehicles do not have specific fire points. Instead.... all passengers may fire Measure range and LOS from the hull"

This seems to imply the whole vehicle is treated as a fire point..


--------------------
Please ban everyone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Reclusiarch Rusty
post Feb 22 2012, 10:04 PM
Post #11


Member
*

Group: Veteran Members
Posts: 1,459
Joined: 14-October 06
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 3,241
I think the word specific tips it in favour of neil's interpretation. If the rule didn't say 'specific' then HB's interpretation would be the way.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · 40k Rules Questions · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 03:53 PM
Invision Power Board v2.1.7 © 2013  IPS, Inc.